For over 40 years, Lucius Riccio has actually been active in the administration and enhancement of golf. He has actually studied game-related problems utilizing his analytical and analytical abilities discovered while making an engineering Ph.D. from Lehigh University.
It’s an enthusiasm that has actually led Riccio to his newest work: a forecasting design for golf’s expert ranks. He holds the accurate formula close to the vest, it’s grounded in matching gamer historic information to particular qualities of the course being played. In the screening phases, it’s produced remarkable outcomes, like properly selecting underdog Wesley Bryan’s win at Hilton Head this spring, and selected 5 of the leading 10 at last week’s FedEx St. Jude Classic, consisting of Daniel Berger.
Choosing versus the spread is so tough that a 55 percent success rate is seen as successful, and that’s including simply 2 groups. Picture the problem and aggravation included in golf gaming.
No other athletic world is as vulnerable to unpredictability as golf, and with great factor. In brief, betting in golf is absolutely nothing brief of a fool’s errand.
Can Riccio’s maker rack up success on a weekly basis? We’ll be putting his tool to the test on GolfDigest.com, examining and arguing his 10 preferred choices with our specialists’ competition choices.
Think of the trouble and disappointment included in golf gaming.
For over 40 years, Lucius Riccio has actually been active in the administration and enhancement of golf. It’s an enthusiasm that has actually led Riccio to his most current work: a forecasting design for golf’s expert ranks.